JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Ana Isabel Velasquez Arias·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 309 del CPC en la actualidad artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria
Accion De Tutela En Materia De Estabilidad Laboral Reforzada De Madre Cabeza De Familia Y Personas Proximas A Pensionarse
  • Rechazar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia T-326/14 por extemporánea
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-326/14.

Luego de analizar la petición formulada por la accionante, la Sala encontró que la misma fue presentada de manera extemporánea y, en virtud ello, decidió RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporanea la solicitud de aclaracion de sentencia T-326 de 2014, formulada por la ciudadana Ana Isabel Velasquez Arias.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Reporting justice
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
Mauricio González Cuervo
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.